WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by jgw - 03/15/25 09:32 PM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 6 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,261,108 my own book page
5,051,294 We shall overcome
4,251,020 Campaign 2016
3,856,669 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,853 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,545
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 3 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 19 20
BC #37714 10/28/07 04:04 PM
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290
Originally Posted by BC
Can someone name some programs started under the "Reagan Principles" which have bettered this nation?

I think that the Nation has been significantly improved by the intense effort of the Reagan administration to cure so many of the chronically insane and convert them to something that any freerange American would agree are good and wholesome citizens, the outdoorsmen!

There are so many other programs to discuss it it hard to pick just one that that opitomises the Reagan philosophy, but the cats-up to vegetable transformation was an indisputable high point.

[Linked Image from miltontrainworks.com]

TAT


There's nothing wrong with thinking
Except that it's lonesome work
sevil regit
BC #37719 10/28/07 04:21 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
Quote
I don't believe FDR fit within the 28 year time frame I noted Senator.
FDR does not fit in the time of 28 years because in those 28 years no president has received a mandate as did Ronald W. Reagan. Very few presidents have received one if you consider a mandate a landslide victory over their opponent. Those that have won by a landslide are FDR, LBJ and RWR. So by choosing a 28 year time frame you effectively limit the discussion. Limiting the discussion to just one of our presidents who has received a mandate is to skewer the results.


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
#37722 10/28/07 04:27 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
You know, every time I see the title to this thread I laugh out loud. Reagan and principles? Give me a break. Reagan was the biggest fake and liar on the planet in his day. The problem was, he lost track of reality and started believing his press. What is even more shocking is that people still believe.
To believe that is to believe all of the negative comments that have been written about Pres. Reagan and to discount all of the positive comments. Reagan was not perfect but he was far and away better than any president in recent history.


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
What was great about Pres. Reagan was that he didn't start any programs! We have too damn many government programs as it is. What needs to be done is to start getting rid of government programs not adding more of them! Reagan's desire to get rid of government programs was the principle of his that defines what is conservatism.


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
I ceased living in a fantasy land when I was about 10. Just because Ronald Reagan lived there doesn't mean it applied to the rest of us, we had to live in the real world where things got immeasurably worse because of his incompetent leadership. He was mendacious, a fool, and a criminal. He was not "great" except in the sense of being a great fraud. No sense in perpetuating that by giving him credence and lauding his mismanagement.


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
#37728 10/28/07 04:46 PM
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831
Likes: 180
President Reagan was a loveable old cowboy.

Last edited by Greger; 10/28/07 07:53 PM. Reason: it served no purpose

Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
Offline
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
What was great about Pres. Reagan was that he didn't start any programs! We have too damn many government programs as it is. What needs to be done is to start getting rid of government programs not adding more of them! Reagan's desire to get rid of government programs was the principle of his that defines what is conservatism.

Right, like the missile defense shield


"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
#37730 10/28/07 04:47 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
Originally Posted by NW Ponderer
I ceased living in a fantasy land when I was about 10. Just because Ronald Reagan lived there doesn't mean it applied to the rest of us, we had to live in the real world where things got immeasurably worse because of his incompetent leadership. He was mendacious, a fool, and a criminal. He was not "great" except in the sense of being a great fraud. No sense in perpetuating that by giving him credence and lauding his mismanagement.
What a biased and close minded response. In essence what you are saying NW, is I don't like Pres. Reagan because of what I know about him and have no interest in finding out if I am wrong. Pope John Paul II didn't think Reagan was a fool. Margaret Thathcer didn't think Reagan was a fool. Lech Walsea didn't think Reagan was a fool. Mikhail Gorbachev didn't think Reagan was a fool. Do you know more about Reagan than they did, NW?


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Ardy #37731 10/28/07 04:52 PM
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
Offline
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
Quote
Right, like the missile defense shield
Defense programs excluded. To defend our country is a legitimate responsibility of our government.


The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity.
I'm a conservative because I question authority.
Conservative Revolutionary
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Moderator
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003
Likes: 191
Originally Posted by Senator Hatrack
What a biased and close minded response. In essence what you are saying NW, is I don't like Pres. Reagan because of what I know about him and have no interest in finding out if I am wrong. Pope John Paul II didn't think Reagan was a fool. Margaret Thathcer didn't think Reagan was a fool. Lech Walsea didn't think Reagan was a fool. Mikhail Gorbachev didn't think Reagan was a fool. Do you know more about Reagan than they did, NW?
Good LORD man, I lived through it! And how is it that you are so sure that those others (some of whom were fools themselves) felt that way about Reagan? I have spent a good deal of time researching the impact of the Reagan years, and it ain't pretty.
Quote
His death has unleashed a torrent of commentary on the significance of this revolution, and so it is important to set the record straight. His economic policies were mostly a failure. Partly this was because he had promised something arithmetically impossible: to increase military spending, cut taxes, and balance the budget. He kept the first two promises, delivering the largest peacetime military build-up in American history, and cutting taxes massively, mostly for upper-income households.

But budget deficits soared to record heights. The national debt doubled, as a percentage of the economy, before Mr. Reagan's successors were able to bring it under control. This "military Keynesianism" did pull the economy out of the 1982 recession, but the 1980s still chalked up the slowest growth of any decade in the post-World War II era. And income was redistributed to the wealthy as never before: during the 1980s, most of the country's income gains went to the top 1 or 2 percent of households.

Mr. Reagan also helped redistribute American income and wealth with a bold assault on American labor. In 1981 he summarily fired 12,000 air traffic controllers who went on strike for better working conditions. This ushered in a new and dark era of labor relations, with employers now free to "permanently replace" striking workers. The median real wage failed to grow during the decade of the 1980s.

The Reagan revolution caused even more economic damage internationally, for example by changing policy at the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. Thus began the era of "structural adjustment" -- a set of economic policies that has become so discredited worldwide that the IMF and World Bank no longer use the term. The 1980s became "the lost decade" for Latin America, the region most affected by Washington's foreign economic policy. Income per person actually shrank for the decade, a rare historical event, and the region has yet to come close to its pre-1980s growth rates.
Ronald Reagan's Legacy by Mark Weisbrot. Even though the source is Common Dreams, the detail is accurate and succinct. Other resources that can be ignored: The Nation The Real Reagan Legacy American Politics The Reagan legacy Salon.com

Fact check them yourself, and you will see why I am so derisive. He did incalculable damage to democracy,
Quote
His Administration cuddled up with the fascistic and anti-Semitic junta of Argentina and backed militaries in El Salvador and Guatemala that massacred civilians. It moved to normalize relations with Augusto Pinochet, the tyrant of Chile. Reagan sent George Bush the First to the Philippines, where the Vice President toasted dictator Ferdinand Marcos for fostering "democracy." Pursuing a quasi-secret war against the Sandinista government in Nicaragua, the Reagan Administration violated international law and circumvented Congress to support contra rebels engaged in human rights abuses and, according to the CIA's own Inspector General, worked with suspected drug traffickers. Reagan covertly sent arms to the mullahs of Iran and courted Saddam Hussein, even after his use of chemical weapons.
, to the economy,
Quote
the total federal tax burden increased during the Reagan years, and most Americans paid more in taxes after Reagan than before. The "Reagan Recovery" was unremarkable. It looks great only contrasted against the dismal Reagan Recession...GOP Senators, notably including Bob Dole, led the way on tax hikes. The economy enjoyed its recovery only after total tax increases larger than the total tax cuts were implemented. Most importantly, average annual GDP growth during the Reagan 80s was lower than during the Clinton 90s or the JFK-LBJ 60s!
to international relations (see above) and set the stage for the corrupt criminality of the current administration (remember Iran-Contra?). He should have been impeached and jailed, not lauded. It is only by exercising the same kind of selective memory he was famous for that the confidence machine he engineered is able to conjure up fake tributes to his "greatness."


A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Page 3 of 20 1 2 3 4 5 19 20

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5