0 members (),
9
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,558
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010 |
Though a great believer in the prowess, greatness, courage and sagacity of President Ronald Wilson Reagan, I sometimes have trouble reconciling the notion that the president brought down the USSR and not that the USSR inevitably collapsed under the weight of the fatally flawed communist system. It is not so confusing as you imagine. The soviet Union was an incredibly successful nation based on the principals of scientific socialism. This colossus could only have been stopped by an even greater person, who, virtually by himself destroyed this implacable evil juggernaut.
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 4,290 |
Everyone is getting in touch with their inner "Irked"!
TAT
There's nothing wrong with thinking Except that it's lonesome work sevil regit
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
|
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655 |
Though a great believer in the prowess, greatness, courage and sagacity of President Ronald Wilson Reagan, I sometimes have trouble reconciling the notion that the president brought down the USSR and not that the USSR inevitably collapsed under the weight of the fatally flawed communist system. Pres. Reagan knew that communism was/is a flawed economic system that was ready to collapse under its own weight. Rather than continue to prop it up as had our country's policy under detente Reagan started to push the USSR towards its inevitable collapse. He did so with the denial of providing help to build an oil pipeline that would have provided the USSR with much needed hard currency. Without that influx of hard currency the inevitable came sooner than expected.
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity. I'm a conservative because I question authority. Conservative Revolutionary
|
|
|
|
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831 Likes: 180
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 19,831 Likes: 180 |
Just a side note but how long you figure we've got before the US needs an influx of hard currency that may not be forthcoming?
Last edited by Greger; 11/13/07 01:20 AM.
Good coffee, good weed, and time on my hands...
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003 Likes: 191
Moderator Carpal Tunnel
|
Moderator Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003 Likes: 191 |
The reason I have such a visceral and negative reaction to "Reagan" is that he purported to be a man of principle, and was, in fact, the opposite. He had neither acumen nor honor, but was perfectly willing to take responsibility for anything that happened to be in his favor, whether he had anything to do with it or not. He was the consummate hypocrite and cared not a whit for others, he just played that role, and often did the opposite of what he claimed.
The policies that he allowed to be put in place during his watch have been disasterous for the country, almost without exception (indeed, I can't think of one, but I am allowing for the possibility). The idea that he "saw" the fall of communist Russia and "pushed" them toward bankruptcy is unsupportable historically. (Mikhail Gorbachev was the true achitect, although even he did not envision the breakup as it occurred.) It is a myth that was created after the fact, like most of his "history."
Last edited by NW Ponderer; 11/13/07 07:48 PM.
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.
Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010
Pooh-Bah
|
Pooh-Bah
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 12,010 |
The idea that he "saw" the fall of communist Russia and "pushed" them toward bankruptcy is unsupportable historically. I had never really examined this assumption. But it does seem that you have a point. After all, even after the Soviet Union had collapsed, the hawks within the Reagan admin were all saying it was a trick to get us to let down our guard. There was no consensus at the time that the dramatic rapid collapse of the evil empire was possible. Everyone just assumed that this cold war confrontation would go on forever (plus or minus a century)
"It's not a lie if you believe it." -- George Costanza The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves. --Bertrand Russel
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,646
Carpal Tunnel
|
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,646 |
The reason I have such a visceral and negative reaction to "Reagan" is that he purported to be a man of principle, and was, in fact, the opposite. By that do you mean he was "a politician"?
Steve Give us the wisdom to teach our children to love, to respect and be kind to one another, so that we may grow with peace in mind. (Native American prayer)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235
old hand
|
old hand
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 6,235 |
Steve, you may be too young to remember, but Ronald Reagan was more than a mere politician. So. Much. More.
"I have studied. I have thought about it. I know I am correct." J. Coleman (Founder of the Weather Channel poo-poos Globwarm)
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003 Likes: 191
Moderator Carpal Tunnel
|
Moderator Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 18,003 Likes: 191 |
The reason I have such a visceral and negative reaction to "Reagan" is that he purported to be a man of principle, and was, in fact, the opposite. By that do you mean he was "a politician"? of the least principled sort. What Ardy and Fermi have pointed out is that he was so much more than "just" a politician. There are many kinds of politicians, and there are many honorable and decent people who take their responsibilities as our representatives quite seriously and solemnly. I will never castigate all of them as a class. Collectively, however, they are not doing well. But Reagan was a special case, as is the current Bush. They are politicians with an ideological bent that is inhumane, not in a general way, but toward specific people: Americans. They are craven and only beholden to the moneyed class. "Average" Americans (that is, the other 99%) are beneath their consideration. Remember the whole "Welfare Queen" story? That was typical Reagan: Tell a whopper of a lie, denigrate a whole class of people, and make it look like you are a populist. Why be specific and accurate when you can paint with a broad brush and condemn anyone who is close at hand? Ronald Reagan was simply more talented than Hitler and Bush. He hid his evil better.
Last edited by NW Ponderer; 11/14/07 02:51 PM.
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.
Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655
member
|
member
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,655 |
The reason I have such a visceral and negative reaction to "Reagan" is that he purported to be a man of principle, and was, in fact, the opposite. He had neither acumen nor honor, but was perfectly willing to take responsibility for anything that happened to be in his favor, whether he had anything to do with it or not. He was the consummate hypocrite and cared not a whit for others, he just played that role, and often did the opposite of what he claimed.
The policies that he allowed to be put in place during his watch have been disasterous for the country, almost without exception (indeed, I can't think of one, but I am allowing for the possibility). The idea that he "saw" the fall of communist Russia and "pushed" them toward bankruptcy is unsupportable historically. (Mikhail Gorbachev was the true achitect, although even he did not envision the breakup as it occurred.) It is a myth that was created after the fact, like most of his "history." If that is what you think of Ronald W. Reagan then you do not know the man. I have suggested some books about Reagan for people to read. Have even thought to read any of them, NW? Or do you prefer to keep your opinion of Reagan unchallenged by people who have a positive opinion of him?
The state can never straighten the crooked timber of humanity. I'm a conservative because I question authority. Conservative Revolutionary
|
|
|
|
|