Originally Posted by a knight
Quote
A popular argument in favor of Second Amendment absolutism is that without it, you wouldn’t have any way to defend the other amendments. My riposte is that without the First Amendment, this country wouldn’t be worth defending.

Francis Volpe, "2nd Amendment is not the one under fire", The Sentinel Newspaper, Carlisle, Pennsylvania, November 27, 2007

has the right to ownership of guns defended the right of haebus corpus in the US?

or is the right to arms bearing there to merely defend the right to bear arms?

hmmm just thinking about it. it doesnt guarantee ownserhip, just he bearing of them.

semantic wrangling sorry

"The basic tool for the manipulation of reality is the manipulation of words. If you can control the meaning of words, you can control the people who must use the words."
(Philip K.Dick)