Capitol Hill Blue Forums Hot Topics & Breaking News News Benazir Bhutto killed in bomb blast

Reports indicate that Bhutto's last words before being silenced addressed the growing fanatical religious extremism in the country.

All indicators show that this speech pointed at the extremists in the so-called "tribal areas", which of course can be compared to
"Dominionist" tribal areas in the United States of America.

I live in one such area, known as "Occupied Texas".

JeffH in "you know where"

I'm not sure what any of this means but I do have a good recipe for chicken tika masala.

OK, assuming RR is not yet the Food Channel forum:

Who, or is it whom, I never know, do you suspect might be all giggly and gleeful over the tragedy of Bhutto's assassination? Neocons. Zionists. The Taliban and the Christiban.

It takes us closer to real nuclear terrorism as Pakistan is the only Muslim nation with nukes. The argument can be made to send more troops to Pakistan, some having been sent a week or two ago. (Perhaps we can send some of the troops we have at the big base in Paraguay.)

Certainly anything that brings the world closer to all out war in the Middle East excites the hell out of Christiban end timers. Bush and Company will certainly find support for more military involvement in Pakistan from Robertson and Dobson and all the other Christiban leaders. The Zionists certainly have already sent their support to Bush and to the Neocons and through the Neocons.

There are powerful imperialist elements in America who will want to take advantage of the situation.

Can we still attack Iran in the spring while holding the lid down in Pakistan, while soon fighting the war we should have fought in Afghanistan 6 years ago? That is Bush's dilemma. Don't look for Pelosi or Reid to guide Bush toward making sound decisions. They're happy with Bush where he is for now.

Thankfully, our vital ally in the War on Terror is still firmly in charge in Pakistan. President Pervez Musharraf will quickly restore order and root out the evil-doers who have committed this most heinous of crimes.

A Radical Islamic Movement has been the root cause of all the recent troubles in Pakistan, drawing together like-minded terrorists from across the region in an effort to disrupt one of the only truly (along with India) stabilizing and democratic forces in the area.

This latest attempt will fail to achieve its objective, just as all the others have failed.

Justice will be had and it will be a harsh justice.

Yes indeed. Wouldn't you agree that it is a bit ironic that Osama has enjoyed great personal peace and security in Pakistan while Bhutto returned not once but twice to a Pakistan that welcomed her with violence and eventually death? Great friends and allies we have there.

It's disgusting, Mick.

And terribly, awfully sad.

From the Guardian:

We are steadily working to reach our objectives, many of which have already been met.

Who killed Benazir Bhutto?

O'Reilly Factor: al Queda

Hannity and Colms: al Queda



,


Try: Elements of the Army and intelligence service that stood to lose money and power if she became prime minister. The ISI includes some Islamists who became radicalized while running the American-funded campaign against the Soviets in Afghanistan and were opposed to her on principle. Saudi Arabia is also thought to have frowned on Ms Bhutto as being too secular and Westernised and to have favored Nawaz Sharif, another former Prime Minister.

Here is the problem: The U.S. has given over 10 BILLION dollars to Pakistan in military aid - a country that has infiltrators in every level of government and military that are Islamic extremists.

So from slipped Mick we get the Zionists, Neocons, & Christian fundamentalists killing Bhutto as a precursor to invasion from a base in Paraguay. Well let me propose a counter argument – I contend that Hillary Clinton, working with Barak Obama and the folks from move on conducted a secret operation using Palestinian operatives training in PETA camps in the south of France!!