Originally Posted by stereoman
OFF TOPIC

Vhia Kane, after six years of observing VP Cheney in office, I have learned that he says little of substance, and when he does speak, what he says is often not true. If you review the events of Spring 2007, particularly what was happening in the Persian Gulf, and what was being said about weapons being smuggled into Iraq, you will find the drumbeats of war were almost deafening, and Mr. Cheney was in the forefront peddling the Administration's "all options" rhetoric and echoing the Zionist "we will not permit" line. Ludicrous indeed, that at the same time as Mr. Cheney was eagerly pitching the threat of Iran as a terrist state, Musharraf was signing a treaty with the al-Qaeda influenced tribal cabals in Waziristan.

At the very same moment.

So, and correct me if I am wrong, Stereoman, what you are saying is that you actually performed an analysis based on the intelligence available at the time from a number of different sources, rather than waiting for Dick Cheney to send a memo outlining his hopes, desires, and intent?

I can see why such a novel approach to figuring out what may be planned by the secretive powers that be, would comfuse some who may be much less eager to stray from the safety of group-think'.:-)
Yours,
Issodhos

Last edited by issodhos; 12/31/07 05:25 PM.

"When all has been said that can be said, and all has been done that can be done, there will be poetry";-) -- Issodhos