Quote
So, in a libertarian-oriented society there would still be laws. In such a society it would be recognized that the purpose for establishing governments is to secure and to protect the natural rights of the individual. This does not mean that the laws would reflect all the same laws that are in effect today, because the basic premise within a libertarian society is neither the state nor the individual can aggress against another except to defend against a physical attack.

Laws implies lawmakers. Would the Constitution not be sufficient?

Secure and protect? Implies a police force of some sort. Wouldn't that amount to coercive force of the State? To benefit one individual from another individual? Who appoints the impartial judge? Who picks the appointer of the impartial judge?

The basic premise within a libertarian society is neither the state nor the individual can aggress against another except to defend against a physical attack? So if there is no physical attack there is no actionable offense? If I pollute the water on my property and it flows downstream to yours and kills your animals, what happens then?