I would agree with you, Schlack,but we're not talking blogs here, we're talking a major American newspaper. And this article isn't controversial - it's the sexist, print equivalent of Amos 'n' Andy.

If they wanted controversy, there are hundreds, if not thousands, of topics they might have selected simply from the area of "women's issues." They could even do it in a way that was both informative and entertaining. This article is neither.

And someone just reminded me - would anyone care to "compare and contrast" this supposed swooning over Obama with the wolf whistles and general "va-va-voom" silliness on this site whenever Elizabeth Kucinich is pictured/mentioned?

Last edited by Mellowicious; 03/04/08 12:04 PM.

Julia
A 45’s quicker than 409
Betty’s cleaning’ house for the very last time
Betty’s bein’ bad