WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
2024 Election Forum
by perotista - 05/01/25 03:41 PM
Trump 2.0
by perotista - 04/30/25 08:48 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 9 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,266,991 my own book page
5,056,163 We shall overcome
4,257,663 Campaign 2016
3,861,447 Trump's Trumpet
3,060,298 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,433
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
None yet
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,129
Posts314,627
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
There are no members with birthdays on this day.
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 405
Harv3 Offline OP
newbie
OP Offline
newbie
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 405
Here's another jump ball related to a health care proposal from the Hon Dennis John Kucinich[D-OH] which some on this board heart:
Quote
The Kucinich plan will remove private insurance companies from the healthcare system-along with their waste, paperwork, profits, excessive executive salaries, advertising, sales commissions-and redirect resources to actual treatment. Insurance companies do not heal or treat anyone, physicians and health practitioners do. Non-profit national health insurance will decrease total healthcare spending while providing more treatment and services-through reductions in bureaucracy and cost-cutting measures such as bulk purchasing of prescriptions drugs. Funding will come primarily from existing government healthcare spending (more than $1 trillion) and a phased-in tax on employers of 7.7% (almost $1 trillion). The employers' tax is less than the 8.5% of payroll now paid on average by companies that provide private insurance. This type of system-privately-delivered health care, publicly financed -- has worked well in other countries, none of whom spend as much per capita on healthcare as the United States.[snip]
Why reduce the tax burden on business to 7.7% when it is already accustomed to 8.5%? OBTW, when was the last time you heard someone promise, "I'm from the government, I'm here to help"? Can anyone here spell "Katrina" or "Rita"?

Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,646
Carpal Tunnel
Offline
Carpal Tunnel
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 15,646
My friend, you have concisely described why Dennis Kucinich can never be a serious contender for the Oval Office. His "I want to help" attitude just doesn't fit in well at the Olympian Stratospheric level.

I am shocked, shocked I tell you, by your question:
Originally Posted by Harv
Why reduce the tax burden on business to 7.7% when it is already accustomed to 8.5%?
I should think anyone with an iota of supply-side sympathy would immediately retort:
Originally Posted by any given Reaganite
TO STIMULATE THE ECONOMY
Perhaps it was meant as a trick question.


Steve
Give us the wisdom to teach our children to love,
to respect and be kind to one another,
so that we may grow with peace in mind.

(Native American prayer)


Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5