No, Harv3, and a crude distraction. She was quite clear that those who have benefited most from the economic structure should contribute the most to it, which is not what is currently happening. Those who have gotten the most from the system are providing proportionately less. The corollary would be: To each according to his contribution, from each according to his benefit. Trying to distract and name-call is not addressing the substance.

A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich