Oh, I don't disagree, Logan. I think that the standing question renders the issue moot, but I was just exploring a little of the constitutional conundrum that the question of the thread raised. Frankly, I can't get there from here either, so it is really mostly a thought exercise.

A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.

Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich