WE NEED YOUR HELP! Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
Current Topics
Trump 2.0
by Irked - 03/14/25 10:00 AM
2024 Election Forum
by rporter314 - 03/11/25 11:16 PM
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 16 guests, and 0 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Newest Members
Agnostic Politico, Jems, robertjohn, BlackCat13th, ruggedman
6,305 Registered Users
Popular Topics(Views)
10,260,915 my own book page
5,051,279 We shall overcome
4,250,718 Campaign 2016
3,856,322 Trump's Trumpet
3,055,489 3 word story game
Top Posters
pdx rick 47,430
Scoutgal 27,583
Phil Hoskins 21,134
Greger 19,831
Towanda 19,391
Top Likes Received (30 Days)
Irked 1
Forum Statistics
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,539
Members6,305
Most Online294
Dec 6th, 2017
Today's Birthdays
Buzzard's Roost, Troyota
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
K
kap17 Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
K
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
Full story: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/28896765


Can someone familiar with the laws of the country explain why churches are exempt from discriminatory actions?

I get that churches are non-profit organizations and do not pay taxes and other benefits (which I don't agree with but that's a topic for another thread). However, it seems to me that religions private school charge tuition for providing education (and some of them are quite expensive) thus makes them just like any other school or business in this regard. If a private non-religions school kicked someone of a particular religion out of school they would get sued for sure.

Quote
Attorneys argued their expulsion was discrimination because the school took tuition, making it similar to a business setting. But Riverside County Superior Court Judge Gloria Trask ruled in January of 2008 that there was no basis for the lawsuit.



A gem cannot be polished without friction, nor a man perfected without trials. ~Chinese Proverb

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~Jon Hammond
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 5,850
Don't find a link to the ruling in the case but I would assume it is based on the First Amendment separation of church and state.


"The white men were as thick and numerous and aimless as grasshoppers, moving always in a hurry but never seeming to get to whatever place it was they were going to." Dee Brown
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
K
kap17 Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
K
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
Originally Posted by loganrbt
Don't find a link to the ruling in the case but I would assume it is based on the First Amendment separation of church and state.

Does the first ammendment protect discrimination? I thought it protected freedom from descrimination.


A gem cannot be polished without friction, nor a man perfected without trials. ~Chinese Proverb

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~Jon Hammond
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Quote
Reporting from San Francisco -- After a Lutheran school expelled two 16-year-old girls for having "a bond of intimacy" that was "characteristic of a lesbian relationship," the girls sued, contending the school had violated a state anti-discrimination law.

In response to that suit, an appeals court decided this week that the private religious school was not a business and therefore did not have to comply with a state law that prohibits businesses from discriminating. A lawyer for the girls said Tuesday that he would ask the California Supreme Court to overturn the unanimous ruling by a three-judge panel of the 4th District Court of Appeal.

The appeals court called its decision "narrow," but lawyers on both sides of the case said it would protect private religious schools across California from such discrimination suits.
Los Angeles Times

The court similarly found that Boys Scouts of America is not a business and therefore exempt from anti-discrimination laws.

For me, if the school is a religious institution they should be able to discriminate, as stupid as that is. I am unconvinced, however, that this school is not primarily a business.


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,031
R
member
Offline
member
R
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,031
Originally Posted by kap17
...Does the first ammendment protect discrimination? I thought it protected freedom from descrimination.
It's really a question for a lawyer, but, I believe that the FA covers only limitations on Congress, not on individuals or businesses. IIRC, the FA prohibits Congress from (1) denying people the right to petition and seek redress, (2) establishing an official religion, (3) restricting freedom of the press, or (4) denying people the right to assemble peaceably.


Life should be led like a cavalry charge - Theodore Roosevelt
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Offline
Administrator
Bionic Scribe
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 21,134
Because of the 14th Ron, the First applies to any state or governmental agency as well.

But the important distinction here is state law by which discrimination is prohibited in all businesses. Since the court found the school not to be a business, the Constitution really didn't come into play.


Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,523
old hand
Offline
old hand
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 6,523
WTF, over! I just don't understand the whole gay thing. These girls must have been pretty happy, taking them aside and thelling them to be a little more discrete seems to be a bettr course of action than kicking them out of school.

Just show that there are A-Holes everywhere.


A proud member of the Vast Right-wing Conspiracy, Massachusetts Chapter

“The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots and tyrants.”
Thomas Jefferson
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
K
kap17 Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
K
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
Originally Posted by Phil Hoskins
Because of the 14th Ron, the First applies to any state or governmental agency as well.

But the important distinction here is state law by which discrimination is prohibited in all businesses. Since the court found the school not to be a business, the Constitution really didn't come into play.

How is a school that charges for tuition not a business?


A gem cannot be polished without friction, nor a man perfected without trials. ~Chinese Proverb

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~Jon Hammond
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,151
Likes: 54
veteran
Offline
veteran
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 10,151
Likes: 54
It's a not-for-profit organization, kap. Yes, they charge a fee, but (at least in theory) that's only to cover operating expenses.

(We won't talk about endowments...)


Julia
A 45’s quicker than 409
Betty’s cleaning’ house for the very last time
Betty’s bein’ bad
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
K
kap17 Offline OP
member
OP Offline
member
K
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,026
Originally Posted by Mellowicious
It's a not-for-profit organization, kap. Yes, they charge a fee, but (at least in theory) that's only to cover operating expenses.

(We won't talk about endowments...)

So then the question is: can a non-profit organization descriminate?


A gem cannot be polished without friction, nor a man perfected without trials. ~Chinese Proverb

The early bird gets the worm, but the second mouse gets the cheese. ~Jon Hammond
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5