0 members (),
24
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,129
Posts314,593
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
|
by Greger |
Greger |
While our history is important it has become expensive baggage. I think ideally we need to transform into something Doug's server can handle.
We could spare a few decades of snide political comment. To survive we need to streamline, modernize, downsize and outsource. We need to change our overall data footprint before it drives us to extinction.
We need to change.
Perhaps into something we'd be proud to invite our friends to...even friends we sometimes disagree with.
Discuss...?
|
|
|
by Doug Thompson |
Doug Thompson |
I found the oldest column of mine in the current RR listings. It was from January 2017 but had a lot of garbage in it:
[column]
January 20, 2017 | by DOUG THOMPSON - A CHB Opinion
In the four days leading up to Friday�s inauguration of Donald Trump as the 45th President of the United States of America, nearly 450,000 people chose to read a four-year-old story in Capitol Hill Blue about a number of Republicans who would not be attending the second inaugural of Barack Obama.
The article, written by Ken Thomas of The Associated Press, said Republicans, after losing the second straight Presidential election to Obama, weren�t in any mood to celebrate.
More than 100 Repubicans, including members of Congress, chose to attend an event in Las Vegas, called �Restore Our Future� or on vacation getaway or just �trips home� while Democrats flocked to Washington to celebrate another four years of Obama living at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue.
�It�s a good time to lay low,� said John Feeheary, a former top Congressional aide and president of Quinn Gillespie Communications.
Someone found the article in the CHB archives and posted it on Twitter and Facebook as an answer to Republicans and Trump aides who claim Democrats who aren�t attending this year�s inauguration are somehow �unpatriotic.� [End of Clip}
A lof of posts lilke this were full of garbage characters, whmich usually suggests a change in the typeface filter that did ot work. Not sure, I will continuke digging and finding what I can and let everyone know what I find.
UBB changed a lot over the years and we had a lot of problems with MySQL and PhP with translateriongs of older posts updates. The changes could affect older archives as well. Let's hope not.
Doug
|
2 members like this |
|
|
by Doug Thompson |
Doug Thompson |
As I recall, we had to ditch a number of threads after the hack and because of a moderator who felt I betrayed the cause. She was a trusted administrator too, but then copied some material other to other discussion boards to list what she felt was my passage to the dark side. It was a sad time and I almost shut the board down over it, but others, like Phil Hoskins, stepped up and restored some order. Phil and I tangled more than a few times, but he came though, as several of you have in this latest crisis. Thank you. You have been more than I deserve.
I have some database experts who work at Virginia Tech, which is over in an adjoining county, who have volunteered to help examine the archive databases to see what may need to be done to make sure they are clean of any hacks and need any repairs. The three largest drives are up in Fairfax (a five-hour drive away) in Northern Virginia, and I will head up that way in the Spring to pick them up (and probably everything else still in that storage unit) to bring back to the mountains.
Jeff, your help could see how, and if, he archives can put in any form for reading or printing, along with whatever is deciding to do with what is currently on the forum.
We've got a lot or work ahead on this, and the help of all of you is both needed and appreciated. Thank you.
Doug
|
2 members like this |
|
|
by Greger |
Greger |
Jeffery, I'm all in favor of archiving if possible, though I can't imagine anyone would ever have any use for old political rants.
My goal is to keep us online with as little fuss and expense as possible.
Most of the work is going to fall on Doug's shoulders. He's a busy man and I don't want to ask too much of him.
As with all things I prefer to look to the future rather than live in the past.
Topping our current list of "popular topics" is Martha's book thread. She's been dead for over ten years and no one has used that forum for years. Looking over the forums I see that one hasn't had an entry since 2013.
It's time to shuffle sh*t around and create a new board that serves our needs and stays within our limited budget.
|
1 member likes this |
|
|
|