0 members (),
19
guests, and
0
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
Forums59
Topics17,128
Posts314,536
Members6,305
|
Most Online294 Dec 6th, 2017
|
|
There are no members with birthdays on this day. |
|
If a specific post was interesting or useful to you, we recommend that you Like that post. It tells the post author, and others, that you found the information valuable. Clicking Like is another way to let others know that you enjoy it without leaving a comment.
Log in to join the conversation and Like this content.
|
|
|
Irked (Mar 5th 2025) |
Total Likes: 1 |
|
Re: Trump 2.0
#349256
Mar 5th a 08:46 PM
|
by rporter314 |
rporter314 |
The reality is, I believe after watching probably 100 interviews with MAGA and from my own personal experience being surrounded by MAGA, that it doesn't matter what Trump does or says or what happens as a result of what he does or says, they will continue to unconditionally support the son of God. So your comment noting those two candidates would probably win is a bit misleading ... of course they will win! ... it's a foregone conclusion!.
I see a number of pundits are proclaiming Trump is losing support for what is happening ... Yikes .... I believe anyone making those claims now are completely delusional and have no business speaking or writing for an audience greater than one. We are not even 100 days into the Reign of King Donald I, so anything said now would be irrelevant two years from now and maybe now even 50 days from now.
So let me confute my own comment, I say King Donald as it is clear he has subsumed all Congressional prerogatives at this point, and it is now clear that a Republican led Congress can even pass legislation, thus making the only "laws" are the fiats coming from the WH. Since that is the signature of a king, govern by fiat, I can safely conclude my comment is accurate.
Somehow, when I type the words the Reign of King Donald, it doesn't seem like Democracy is anywhere to be found. The SC just sided against Trump on a very narrow suit regarding USAID, which can in my opinion be interpreted as they supported the contractual agreements, it's black letter law and even then 4 MAGA justices thought Trump is indeed the king, so when he stops the flow of money from other streams, they will definitely side with him. Despite lower courts stopping the legal carnage, I suspect when these suits make it to the SC, they will side with Trump. After all he is the son of God, savior of America and in all respects is King of America.
|
|
|
|