WE NEED YOUR HELP!
Please donate to keep ReaderRant online to serve political discussion and its members. (Blue Ridge Photography pays the bills for RR).
You would think that Fox viewers would eventually realize that almost everything Fox has told them (with absolute certainty) has not proved to be true. I suppose their audience is self-selecting: The people who are able to concentrate on anything long enough to figure that out stop watching. The ones who remain have no long-term memory.
Something about the polls... Things are better for Clinton than they look. Her lead in poll averages has remained in the 3-5% range since June. The difference is that a month ago pollsters moved to their "likely voter" models, which have always skewed Republican. So her lead NOW is 3-5% of likely voters, meaning that it's a percent or so higher than previously.
A well reasoned argument is like a diamond: impervious to corruption and crystal clear - and infinitely rarer.
Here, as elsewhere, people are outraged at what feels like a rigged game -- an economy that won't respond, a democracy that won't listen, and a financial sector that holds all the cards. - Robert Reich
Just heard on the radio: Trump; "If Hillary didn't want me using those tax laws, she should have changed them!"
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete. R. Buckminster Fuller
It's another tacit admission that what he did was not "right", even though it may have been legal.
You never change things by fighting the existing reality. To change something, build a new model that makes the old model obsolete. R. Buckminster Fuller
![[Linked Image from i1308.photobucket.com]](http://s1308.photobucket.com/user/rogerr6/media/Screen%20Shot%202016-10-04%20at%201.02.33%20PM_zpszy9iyo04.png.html)
