After reading some of the insanity on the "Can't they be friends" thread, I'm about to switch sides on this subject. If people who belong to the "oppressed" groups can determine in advance which segments of the population can be friends with which other segments of the population, then it seems perfectly rational to me for state legislatures to decide which segments of the population should be allowed to be married to one another. Insanity? Sure. Stupid and silly? Sure. But if the oppressed want to be judgmental, then there is no basis for attacking the "unoppressed" for being similarly judgmental.
So gays have to be unbiased, non-judgmental in order to have rights? Why?
And where did you get your conclusions? Not from anything said on that thread. All that is said there is that people have preferences. Don't you?
