Dr. Been on Youtube reports on a paper from Malaysia. N = about 900, half on Ivermectin and half not. Results showed no statistically significant benefit from IVM. It was a decent dose and schedule for the IVM, according to it's promoters. There was a trend in one of their endpoints that was a bit pro-IVM, but for another endpoint anti-IVM. This is why we set significance at p = 0.05. It could be that if N was 9000, they would have got some results, but in the bigger picture I think IVM is minimally effective. Vaccines and Paxlovid, on the other hand, are highly effective.

Just as a reference point, Dr. Been has been a strong IVM promoter and user for his patients, his family, and himself. Looks like clinging to IVM is beating a dead horse at this point.

Educating anyone benefits everyone.