I see it that if you give people the right to vote on an issue, they have to vote how they see fit according to their values. If this is a civil rights issue the courts should deal with it. Why didn't the "no on 8" people manage to get the measure off the balot if it is unconstitutional?
The Court refused to hear the issue prior to the election which is the right decision. The court always refuses to decide cases of this sort prior to a vote.
