...Maybe you have something other than Leviticus to support your claim?
I consider the author to have been extremely shoddy in his presentation, and to have indulged in a number of logical and factual errors.
Perhaps you think that other parts of Leviticus can be also overlooked? Like the prohibitions on murder, incest, theft and perjury? Of course, perhaps it can be shown that Jesus condoned - or at least did not condemn - these other Levite proscriptions and it is, therefore, acceptable to indulge in them?
One of the problems with arguing from scripture is that you have to come up with all sorts of excuses as to why you should follow this and ignore that.
