I get the point of the article, truly, I do, and maybe it's just the midwesterner in me -- but I'd rather see an article that describes the US without gays - including, perhaps, gay researchers, doctors, therapists, statesmen, professors, financiers, authors...
No disrespect to Hollywood but the contributions of gay people in the US reach so much further than Hollywood that it seems perhaps a disservice to limit the presentation to Hollywood.
It's good of course; I'd just like to see a broader version.
