Originally Posted by california rick
Originally Posted by Jeffro
Religion is a good target for the anger, but the followers are not a good place to attack.
Why isn't it a "good place" to "attack" "the followers." Can not "they" think for themselves?

I really don't see the difference:

[Linked Image from i48.photobucket.com]

Rick, attacking anyone has never seemed to me to win converts to a cause or a position. It can, as with the yes on 8 ads, excite those already committed to a cause or position, but that is not what we need.

We need to cause people to rethink (or maybe think) what they "know" about gay life and gay marriage as well as the principle of equal rights. I fail to see how attacking anyone or even any institution will bring that about.

I urge you to give people the space to make the changes themselves, albeit with your help and inspiration. Have you ever been "attacked" for being gay? How well did that work?

Life is a banquet -- and most poor suckers are starving to death -- Auntie Mame
You are born naked and everything else is drag - RuPaul